| Anonymous on Fri Apr 20 23:42:57 2001 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| No Subject |
ivo
WHAT KIND OF OPPOSITION PARTY IS CROATIA'S NEW DC?
Mate Granic, Croatia's former foreign minister, founded a new
party after he lost the presidential election at the
beginning of this year. The party, in which the more moderate
elements of the Croatian Democratic Community (HDZ) united in
March, is called the Democratic Center (DC). Its platform is
in many ways close to that of the current government, which
may open interesting possibilities for its future.
Even before the death of President Franjo Tudjman in
December 1999, it became clear that the HDZ had lost its once
all-encompassing authority (see "RFE/RL Balkan Report," 16
November 1999). Granic and the HDZ had no chance to win
either the elections for parliament or the presidential
election. The patriotic movement of 1989, which mobilized
Croats against Slobodan Milosevic's centralism, had itself
became an autocratic--and some would say corrupt--force (see
"RFE/RL Balkan Report," 11 April 2000). Croatia's allies
regarded the HDZ as nationalistic and not democratic. So long
as it was in power, the path to Europe and NATO was closed.
And so it remained until Ivica Racan became prime minister
and Stipe Mesic was elected president in early 2000.
On 2 July, Granic came to Munich to discuss his ideas
and his new party before a large audience. In his efforts to
launch the DC and revive his own career, he sought to win
followers among the Croats working and living in Germany.
(The Croatian diaspora is generally interested in politics
and generous with its contributions. Tudjman started the HDZ
in the late 1980s by lining up support from the diaspora.)
Granic distanced himself from his former party and
talked frankly about cases of corruption in the ranks of the
HDZ. (It nonetheless seemed strange to this writer that the
former foreign minister criticized the system he had been a
part of.) By way of explanation, Granic said that the HDZ was
not a party but rather a mass movement combining very
different interests. Because of isolationist elements in it,
he was not able to create a policy that was more orientated
toward Europe. Granic argued that he had not left the HDZ
because of the electoral debacle but because the HDZ was
unable to implement reforms from within.
But he was not altogether negative toward his former
party. He stressed that it is unfair to say that all members
of that party were criminals. This notion--which in Granic's
words is very popular in the Croatian media at the moment--
has nothing to do with reality. The HDZ helped build the new,
independent state, as Granic pointed out. The party was in
power when the Croatian army drove the Serbian forces out of
the country in 1995. Those and subsequent Croatian military
operations against the Serbs in 1995 prepared the way for the
Dayton peace agreement. The Croatian victory, in fact,
changed the military landscape of the whole region. The HDZ,
Granic stressed, was also responsible for the peaceful
reintegration of eastern Slavonia starting in 1998.
Although in opposition to the current government, Granic
talked about what he called the remarkable moves Mesic and
Racan have made toward European integration. There is no
doubt that becoming a member of NATO's Partnership for Peace
program in May was the greatest success for the six ruling
political parties in the governing coalition.
Turning to domestic politics, Granic pointed out that
Racan has not been able to cut the unemployment rate yet.
Granic also said that he can not agree with the kind of
investigation the new government is conducting against some
Croatian officers who hold the status of war invalids. In too
many cases, the new government has accused officers of being
criminals seeking access to pensions and privileges to which
they are not legally entitled, Granic argued. In his view, a
lot of the officers deserve the privileges once given to
them.
The issue of war crimes proved more delicate, and some
of the people in the Munich diaspora audience could not agree
with Granic when he talked about that subject. He stressed
that Croats should not engage in "irresponsible populism" (as
the former regime did), and that Croatian soldiers guilty of
war crimes must be sent to the Hague. Croatia has an
obligation towards the UN and its tribunal, and there is no
way around it, he added.
In this respect, the DC has the same position as the
government. In the weekly "Nacional" of 31 May, Granic
mentioned another interesting reason for the punishment of
war crimes: Croatia has to show that it able to capture all
war criminals who fought under the Croatian flag. Then, as
part of a general catharsis, it would be morally in a
position to demand a search for individuals who killed
Croatian civilians, especially on the territory of the
Muslim-Croat federation. Granic wrote in "Nacional" about 14
well-documented cases of mass killings of Croatian civilians
on federation territory.
Concerning the issue of the intelligence services, the
DC wants transparency and professional, civilian control.
This remains an important topic in Croatia because of the
misuse of the secret services for political purposes during
the reign of President Tudjman. After Mesic and Racan decided
to "transform" the Croatian Intelligence Service (HIS) in
May, policemen occupied the HIS offices to prevent the old
staff from tampering with important documents (see "RFE/RL
Newsline," 25 May 2000). Granic commented on these events in
"Nacional." He wrote that the reorganization of the whole
intelligence system is very important and that
professionalism should be the key. Appointments should not be
made because of political or personal connections, he
stressed.
Granic's DC thus does not differ very much from the
views of the government on a number of key points. This may
be the reason why the DC will be a "constructive opposition,"
as Granic put it in Munich. It is significant that even
President Mesic described DC as a factor that can help
strengthen the ruling coalition (see "Globus," 23 June 2000).
In fact, some analysts already see the DC as part of a
future government without Racan's former communists. If
Racan's government collapses because of Croatia's economic
problems and tensions mount between the parties of the
coalition, President Mesic and his People's Party (HNS) will
likely decide the makeup of a new governing coalition (see
"RFE/RL Newsline," 12 and 13 July 2000). Granic's party could
then become an interesting possibility for them. The DC has
meanwhile won the local election in the town of Samobor. This
was a big success for the party, keeping in mind that it was
founded only a few months ago.
The bickering within the governing coalition has
meanwhile been growing by the week. If a new center-right
coalition emerges from a reconfiguration of power, the DC
might not stay in the opposition for too long. (Christian
Buric)
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net